| Article ID: | iaor20073338 |
| Country: | Greece |
| Volume: | 4 |
| Issue: | 3 |
| Publication Date: | Sep 2004 |
| Journal: | Operational Research - An International Journal |
| Authors: | Zopounidis Constantin, Doumpos Michael, Spathis Ch. |
| Keywords: | financial, decision theory: multiple criteria |
This study investigates the contribution of financial and non-financial information to enhance the ability to discriminate between the choices of a qualified or unqualified (clean) audit report. The audit firms face the risk of losing the client if they issue a qualification. On the other hand, failing to qualify exposes the auditor to lawsuits and reputation loss. Financial statements, auditors' opinions, and the notes to financial statements are examined for a sample of 100 firms. The auditors' qualification decision is modelled using a multicriteria decision aid classification method (MHDIS-Multigroup Hierarchical DIScrimination). A comparison with statistical techniques (linear discriminant analysis and logit analysis) is also performed. This study has implications for internal and external auditors and company decision makers.