Highlights from the early (and pre-) history of reliability engineering

Highlights from the early (and pre-) history of reliability engineering

0.00 Avg rating0 Votes
Article ID: iaor20063285
Country: Netherlands
Volume: 91
Issue: 2
Start Page Number: 249
End Page Number: 256
Publication Date: Feb 2006
Journal: Reliability Engineering & Systems Safety
Authors: ,
Keywords: history
Abstract:

Reliability is a popular concept that has been celebrated for years as a commendable attribute of a person or an artifact. From its modest beginning in 1816 – the word reliability was first coined by Samuel T. Coleridge – reliability grew into an omnipresent attribute with qualitative and quantitative connotations that pervades every aspect of our present day technologically intensive world. In this short communication, we highlight key events and the history of ideas that led to the birth of Reliability Engineering, and its development in the subsequent decades. We first argue that statistics and mass production were the enablers in the rise of this new discipline, and the catalyst that accelerated the coming of this new discipline was the (unreliability of the) vacuum tube. We highlight the foundational role of AGREE report in 1957 in the birth of reliability engineering, and discuss the consolidation of numerous efforts in the 1950s into a coherent new technical discipline. We show that an evolution took place in the discipline in the following two decades along two directions: first, there was an increased specialization in the discipline (increased sophistication of statistical techniques, and the rise of a new branch focused on the actual physics of failure of components, Reliability Physics); second, there occurred a shift in the emphasis of the discipline from a component-centric to an emphasis on system-level attributes (system reliability, availability, safety). Finally, in selecting the particular events and highlights in the history of ideas that led to the birth and subsequent development of reliability engineering, we acknowledge a subjective component in this work and make no claims to exhaustiveness.

Reviews

Required fields are marked *. Your email address will not be published.