Scheduling a production–distribution system to optimize the tradeoff between delivery tardiness and distribution cost

Scheduling a production–distribution system to optimize the tradeoff between delivery tardiness and distribution cost

0.00 Avg rating0 Votes
Article ID: iaor20063004
Country: United States
Volume: 52
Issue: 6
Start Page Number: 571
End Page Number: 589
Publication Date: Sep 2005
Journal: Naval Research Logistics
Authors: ,
Keywords: programming: dynamic, scheduling, heuristics
Abstract:

We consider a make-to-order production–distribution system with one supplier and one or more customers. A set of orders with due dates needs to be processed by the supplier and delivered to the customers upon completion. The supplier can process one order at a time without preemption. Each customer is at a distinct location and only orders from the same customer can be batched together for delivery. Each delivery shipment has a capacity limit and incurs a distribution cost. The problem is to find a joint schedule of order processing at the supplier and order delivery from the supplier to the customers that optimizes an objective function involving the maximum delivery tardiness and the total distribution cost. We first study the solvability of various cases of the problem by either providing an efficient algorithm or proving the intractability of the problem. We then develop a fast heuristic for the general problem. We show that the heuristic is asymptotically optimal as the number of orders goes to infinity. We also evaluate the performance of the heuristic computationally by using lower bounds obtained by a column generation approach. Our results indicate that the heuristic is capable of generating near optimal solutions quickly. Finally, we study the value of production–distribution integration by comparing our integrated approach with two sequential approaches where scheduling decisions for order processing are made first, followed by order delivery decisions, with no or only partial integration of the two decisions. We show that in many cases, the integrated approach performs significantly better than the sequential approaches.

Reviews

Required fields are marked *. Your email address will not be published.