| Article ID: | iaor20053188 |
| Country: | Netherlands |
| Volume: | 8 |
| Issue: | 2 |
| Start Page Number: | 167 |
| End Page Number: | 179 |
| Publication Date: | May 2005 |
| Journal: | Health Care Management Science |
| Authors: | Vernon John A., Hughen W. Keener, Johnson Scott J. |
| Keywords: | decision: studies |
In the face of significant real healthcare cost inflation, pressured budgets, and ongoing launches of myriad technology of uncertain value, payers have formalized new valuation techniques that represent a barrier to entry for drugs. Cost-effectiveness analysis predominates among these methods, which involves differencing a new technological intervention's marginal costs and benefits with a comparator's, and comparing the resulting ratio to a payer's willingness-to-pay threshold. In this paper we describe how firms are able to model the feasible range of future product prices when making in-licensing and development Go/No-Go decisions by considering payers' use of the cost-effectiveness method. We illustrate this analytic method with a simple deterministic example and then incorporate stochastic assumptions using both analytic and simulation methods. Using this strategic approach, firms may reduce product development and in-licensing risk.