Article ID: | iaor20052957 |
Country: | United States |
Volume: | 7 |
Issue: | 1 |
Start Page Number: | 74 |
End Page Number: | 80 |
Publication Date: | Dec 2005 |
Journal: | Manufacturing & Service Operations Management |
Authors: | Thomas D.J. |
The standard treatment of fill rate relies on stationary and serially independent demand over an infinite horizon. Even if demand is stationary, managers are held accountable for performance over a finite horizon. In a finite horizon, the fill rate is a random variable. Studying the distribution is relevant because a vendor may be subject to financial penalty if she fails to achieve her target fill rate over a specified finite period. It is known that for a zero lead time, base-stock model, the expected value of a finite-horizon fill rate exceeds the long-run fill rate. In this paper, I investigate the behaviour of the distribution of the finite-horizon fill rate when a stationary base-stock policy is used to control inventory. For a vendor facing a finite-horizon, fill-rate level contract and using a stationary stocking policy, I examine how the length of the review horizon (i.e., monthly or quarterly), the demand distribution, and the cost of failing to meet the target affect the stocking decision.