Response surface methodology's steepest ascent and step size revisited

Response surface methodology's steepest ascent and step size revisited

0.00 Avg rating0 Votes
Article ID: iaor20052759
Country: Netherlands
Volume: 159
Issue: 1
Start Page Number: 121
End Page Number: 131
Publication Date: Nov 2004
Journal: European Journal of Operational Research
Authors: , ,
Keywords: statistics: decision
Abstract:

Response surface methodology (RSM) searches for the input combination maximizing the output of a real system or its simulation. RSM is a heuristic that locally fits first-order polynomials, and estimates the corresponding steepest ascent (SA) paths. However, SA is scale-dependent; and its step size is selected intuitively. To tackle these two problems, this paper derives novel techniques combining mathematical statistics and mathematical programming. Technique 1, called ‘adapted’ SA (ASA), accounts for the covariances between the components of the estimated local gradient. ASA is scale-independent. The step-size problem is solved tentatively. Technique 2 does follow the SA direction, but with a step size inspired by ASA. Mathematical properties of the two techniques are derived and interpreted; numerical examples illustrate these properties. The search directions of the two techniques are explored in Monte Carlo experiments. These experiments show that, in general, ASA gives a better search direction than SA.

Reviews

Required fields are marked *. Your email address will not be published.