Article ID: | iaor20042932 |
Country: | United States |
Volume: | 15 |
Issue: | 4 |
Start Page Number: | 542 |
End Page Number: | 564 |
Publication Date: | Jan 2003 |
Journal: | Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management |
Authors: | Mol Nico P., Kruijf Johan A. M. de |
Keywords: | urban affairs |
In the Dutch central government (following countries like New Zealand, Australia and the UK) a system of resource budgeting is being developed as a substitute for its present dual system of cash/commitment budgeting for core departments and accrual accounting for executive agencies. Advocates of this approach claim that resource budgeting will improve the allocation of government spending and increase efficiency in government production. A basic flaw of the reform proposals is the failure to acknowledge the hybridity of government activities and the need to accommodate these hybridities in the accounting system. We argue that the present dual system, with some minor revisions, will be superior to the proposed resource budgeting system.