Article ID: | iaor20042930 |
Country: | United States |
Volume: | 15 |
Issue: | 4 |
Start Page Number: | 505 |
End Page Number: | 524 |
Publication Date: | Jan 2003 |
Journal: | Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management |
Authors: | Stolp Chandler, Staley Andrew Blair, Dastoor Barbara, Magner Nace R. |
This study examines the contribution of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice in Federal budget decision-making to Federal managers' commitment to the Federal government as an employing organization. A total of 1,358 useable surveys were received from a sample of 9,643 managers. Reliability coefficients were acceptable (> 0.70), and intercorrelations consistent with previous studies. Hierarchical regression analysis supported only main-effect relationships between procedural justice and interactional justice and managers' organizational commitment. No support was found for a main effect relationship between distributive justice and organizational commitment – or for any interactive effects. Contrary to models of bureaucratic behavior based on economic theory, these findings may suggest that Federal managers may be motivated primarily by psychological outcomes of budget decisions.