A comparison of selected artificial neural networks that help auditors evaluate client financial viability

A comparison of selected artificial neural networks that help auditors evaluate client financial viability

0.00 Avg rating0 Votes
Article ID: iaor20031706
Country: United States
Volume: 31
Issue: 2
Start Page Number: 531
End Page Number: 550
Publication Date: Apr 2000
Journal: Decision Sciences
Authors: , ,
Keywords: neural networks, artificial intelligence
Abstract:

This study compares the performance of three artificial neural network (ANN) approaches – backpropagation, categorical learning, and probabilistic neural network – as classification tools to assist and support auditor's judgment about a client's continued financial viability into the future (going concern status). ANN performance is compared on the basis of overall error rates and estimated relative costs of misclassification (incorrectly classifying an insolvent firm as solvent versus classifying a solvent firm as insolvent). When only the overall error rate is considered, the probabilistic neural network is the most reliable in classification, followed by backpropagation and categorical learning network. When the estimated relative costs of misclassification are considered, the categorical learning network is the least costly, followed by backpropagation and probabilistic neural network.

Reviews

Required fields are marked *. Your email address will not be published.