| Article ID: | iaor20013508 |
| Country: | Germany |
| Volume: | 29 |
| Issue: | 3 |
| Start Page Number: | 339 |
| End Page Number: | 357 |
| Publication Date: | Jan 2000 |
| Journal: | International Journal of Game Theory |
| Authors: | Xue L. |
| Keywords: | Nash theory and methods |
This paper defines ‘negotiation-proof Nash equilibrium’, a notion that applies to environments where players can negotiate openly and directly prior to the play of a noncooperative game. It recognizes the possibility that a group of self-interested players may choose, voluntarily and without binding agreement, to coordinate their choice of strategies and make joint objections; moreover, it takes the perfect foresight of rational players fully into account. The merit of the notion of negotiation-proof Nash equilibrium is twofold: (1) It offers a way to rectify the nestedness assumption and myopia embedded in the notion of coalition-proof Nash equilibrium. (2) The negotiation process is formalized by a ‘graph’, which serves as a natural extension to the approach that models preplay communication by an extensive game.