Article ID: | iaor20012215 |
Country: | United States |
Volume: | 29 |
Issue: | 1 |
Start Page Number: | 25 |
End Page Number: | 51 |
Publication Date: | Dec 1998 |
Journal: | Decision Sciences |
Authors: | Ashmos D.P., McDaniel R.R., Duchon D. |
Keywords: | decision: studies |
Each time managers are faced with a strategic decision, they decide how to decide. Specifically, they make choices about who has necessary information and, therefore, who needs to participate in the decision. Such responses to strategic issues are believed to be affected by the way in which decision makers interpret issues. However, organizations develop habitual responses to issues and may be predisposed because of their attention to rules and routines, or because of past performance, to respond to strategic issues in certain ways regardless of how issues are interpreted. We examined the direct and indirect effects of predisposition (rule orientation and past financial performance) and interpretation of strategic issues on the participation of internal stakeholder groups in strategic decision making. Executives in 52 organizations indicated that rule orientation and performance are directly linked to participation in strategic decision making, and that interpretation and rule orientation are directly linked to each other. Implications for managers include the notion that any effort to improve decision-making effectiveness by shaping how organizational members frame and interpret issues will be constrained by the organization's existing routines as well as its past performance.