| Article ID: | iaor20011862 |
| Country: | Netherlands |
| Volume: | 95 |
| Issue: | 1 |
| Start Page Number: | 159 |
| End Page Number: | 175 |
| Publication Date: | Jul 2000 |
| Journal: | Annals of Operations Research |
| Authors: | Barrett T.M., Gilless J. Keith |
| Keywords: | programming: integer, graphs |
Restrictions on the size and proximity of clearcuts have led to the development of a variety of exact and heuristic methods to optimize the net present value of timber harvests, subject to adjacency constraints. Most treat harvest units as pre-defined, and impose adjacency constraints on any two units sharing a common border. By using graph theory notation to define sub-graph adjacency constraints, opening size can be considered variable, which may be more appropriate for landscape-level planning. A small example data set is used in this paper to demonstrate the difference between the two types of adjacency constraints for both integer programming and heuristic solution methods.