This paper presents a study of due date assignment procedures in job shop environments where multi-level assembly jots are processed and due dates are internally assigned. Most of the reported studies in the literature have focused on string type jobs. The authors propose a dynamic update approach (which makes use of Little’s Law) to obtain the coefficients used in the traditional due date assignment procedures of constant allowance (CON), total work content (TWK) and critical path processing time (CPPT), The coefficient assigned to a given job reflect both the state of the shop at the time the job is processed and the characteristics of the job. The approach also provides the shop management with the ability to control the average job lateness. In the simulation experiments conducted in this study, the authors set the average lateness at zero. The analysis of simulation results shows that the proposed dynamic procedures provide overall better shop performance than their static counterparts, especially for less complex assembly job structures. A procedure for determining job due dates that extends the critical path concept of the CPPT procedure to critical path flow time (CPFT) is also proposed. Unlike the others, this procedure does not need the determination of any coefficients. The procedure uses estimates of waiting times at work centers that are determined dynamically based on shop work load information. In this paper, an adaptive adjustment approach is also suggested to bring average lateness for the CPFT procedure to a target value. Results of the simulation experiments show that the CPfT combined with the adaptive adjustment approach (CPFT-ADJ) provides overall improved performance compared to the dynamic and static versions of the CON, TWK, and CPPT procedures for less complex job structures. For more complex assembly job structures and string jobs the CPFT-ADJ procedure results in comparable performance to the dynamic versions of the CON, tWK, and CPPT procedures. The paper also provides an investigation of the interaction between the two priority rules: earliest job due date (JDD) and the earliest operation due date (OPNDD) and the four due date procedures: CON TWK, CPPT, and CPFT-ADJ. In general, for multi-level assembly job structures JDD outperfroms OPNDD in terms of average job lead time and tardiness.
