| Article ID: | iaor19961959 |
| Country: | United States |
| Volume: | 43 |
| Issue: | 4 |
| Start Page Number: | 549 |
| End Page Number: | 562 |
| Publication Date: | Jun 1996 |
| Journal: | Naval Research Logistics |
| Authors: | Dror Moshe, Hartman Bruce C. |
| Keywords: | financial |
A centralized inventory system serves a number of stores with common ownership, and thus reliable and timely information sharing. Each of them pays a share of the inventory cost, and the reward structure leaves the owners of individual stores rewarded for their individual performance. Appropriate selection of a cost allocation method is important if such a centralized system is to last. In this work the authors propose three necessary criteria-stability (core of a related cooperative game), justifiability (consistency of benefits with costs), and polynomial computability. For a concrete example they demonstrate that common allocation procedures may not meet all three tests, and the authors present a method that meets all three criteria. This kind of cost allocation analysis helps the common management to evaluate the trade-offs in choosing an alloction scheme for the cost of inventory centralization.