| Article ID: | iaor19952072 |
| Country: | Netherlands |
| Volume: | 38 |
| Issue: | 2/3 |
| Start Page Number: | 133 |
| End Page Number: | 145 |
| Publication Date: | Mar 1995 |
| Journal: | International Journal of Production Economics |
| Authors: | Logendran Rasaratnam, Mai Luen, Talkington Diane |
| Keywords: | heuristics |
In this paper the comparative performance of several combined heuristics for solving bi-level group scheduling problems is investigated. At the first level, the sequence of parts within a part family/group is determined. While at the second, an appropriate sequence for groups of jobs is determined. Both single-pass and multiple-pass heuristics are selected for completely solving a group scheduling problem at both levels in order to minimize the makespan. Two different research questions are addressed. The first determines which of the combinations, each consisting of a single- (Petrov (PT)) and a multiple-pass heuristic (Logendran and Nudtasomboon (LN); Campbell, Dudek and Smith (CDS)) is a better performer. The second determines which of the two multiple-pass heuristics (LN or CDS) is a better performer, if used at both levels. The experiments have been setup as factorial designs with split-plots across the heuristics. Several test problems are solved for addressing the key issues raised in both questions. Results obtained show that, for research question 1, a combination given by LN at the first level, followed by PT at the second level is the most preferred arrangement. For research question 2, a combination represented by LN-LN outperforms CDS-CDS.