Article ID: | iaor19941278 |
Country: | United States |
Volume: | 8 |
Issue: | 2 |
Start Page Number: | 81 |
End Page Number: | 108 |
Publication Date: | Sep 1991 |
Journal: | Journal of Management Information Systems |
Authors: | Hiltz Starr Roxanne, Johnson Kenneth, Turoff Murray |
Twenty-four groups of five professionals and managers used computer conferences to reach agreement on the best solution to a complex ranking problem. Two software tools for structuring the conferences were employed in a two-by-two factorial design. Group with ‘designated leadership’ (DL) used software support to elect a discussion leader. Groups with ‘statistical feedback’ (SF) were presented with tables periodically that displayed the mean rank and degree of consensus for each item. DL improved levels of consensus; in the absence of a leader, SF improved level of agreement slightly. Statistical feedback as operationalized in this experiment was detrimental to the ability of a group to achieve ‘collective intelligence,’ defined as a group decision better than the prediscussion decision of any of its individual members. Characteristics of the individuals and groups were also associated with variations in outcomes.